Igknowance Tax Synopsis and Rationale: Overview

Igknowant Drivers Igknowing Flooded Roads:
No Insurance for flooded cars

Igknowant Drivers igknow flooded roads until the rising water stops the car. This is an expensive igknowance costing all drivers through insurance claims.

This igknowance violates the Primary Moral Imperative of saving life on earth from climate change. Why? All the work to refurbish flooded cars requires unnecessary activities that generate CO2.

In this case of human igknowance that keeps taxing us, the way to fulfill the Primary Moral tax it is to ban car flood insurance whether a person drives into water or leaves their car in flood-prone areas. (Some people intentionally flood their car so the insurance payment is a downpayment on a newer car.)

Thus, when one million people vote for to end insurance for flooded cars, the insurance industry will stop issuing flood insurance. Failure to do so will result in a retroactive federal tax equal to twice the payout for flooded cars.

Also, there will be fewer water rescues that put the lives of 1st responders at risk. (Rescued igknowant people, in all cases, should pay the cost of rescue ... an after-the-fact igknowance tax.)

An igknowance tax is like the Bill of Rights only it is a Bill of Responsibility, that is, requiring people to respond to their abilities. "Knowants" pay higher insurance rates because of the igknowants. This is also true in politics where knowledgeable people pay for the problems of low information thinkers. Education is the key to fewer time-wasting, money-burning problems.

Auto flood insurance should not be available to car owners.