"Blacks" and "Whites" has too much historical baggage that elicits kneejerk,
mental reactions which close down minds. Mental blocks arise as a person's
hidden igknowance, conscious or unconscious, fills the person's mind. On the
other hand, consider the superiority of chocolate as a descriptive and affable
term. Much better and more logical than "colored."
-
Chocolate comes in all shades from passable bright white chocolate to coal-black,
ebony rich dark chocolate.
-
Chocolate folk are like chocolate in flavors, from sweet to bitter.
-
Chocolate folk can be as common as Hershey or as expensive of Godiva.
Chocolate folk compared to vanilla folk is analogous to the varieties of red
wines to white wines.
-
Red wines have far greater varieties than white wines. While some whites
say that all blacks look alike, a truer truth is what chocolate folk say
of the vanillas: "All whites look alike." (A spectroanalysis of the skin
hues of 1000 blacks and 1000 whites will show this to be true.) The diversity
of chocolate folk reflects the genetic heritage or genetic democracy from
uninvited animal husbandry. The Middle Passage and slave existence speeded
up the natural selection process, winnowing the genetically weak.
-
Red wines have longer staying power, that is, long after white wines have
become sour vinegar, the shelf life of a red wine is still living--when they
auction off century old wines, the wine is red, not white. Due to the greater
genetic diversity of chocolate folk, they have a greater shelf life than
white folk ... all factors being equal. Should humanity survive global
dying, the New World's chocolate folk will probably still be around while
the majority of vanilla folk will have gone the way of the genetically
inferior Neanderthals.
|